Do you think Nukes are real?

[Not Child.]

...Anonymous so you can maintain dig-nuh-tee

 

[CorradoSoprano4]

I have watched Jim Norton stand-up comedy specials. So yes, I do believe in atomic bombs.

 

[Not Child.]

If real, why did they only use it once...and on the least deserving, least shitty people, Japanese?

Japanese Pearl Harbor Attacks vs Islamist Twin Towers Attacks...Why haven't they nuked ONE Muslim entity over the past 80+ years? A weapon that was created to prevent the post-9/11 world PERFECTLY...invented 60 years before 9/11, and not used at all...just used "once" (when t wasn't even needed in Hiroshima/Nagasaki, and the Japs long surrendered).

 

[johnnynoname]

you know what is real?

.....THIS

 

[johnnynoname]

I gave the "F U finger" to the screen after i typed "THIS"

 

[Guest]

Nothing in history is real

 

[Imager]

If real, why did they only use it once...and on the least deserving, least shitty people, Japanese?

Japanese Pearl Harbor Attacks vs Islamist Twin Towers Attacks...Why haven't they nuked ONE Muslim entity over the past 80+ years? A weapon that was created to prevent the post-9/11 world PERFECTLY...invented 60 years before 9/11, and not used at all...just used "once" (when t wasn't even needed in Hiroshima/Nagasaki, and the Japs long surrendered).

Because everyone loses in a nuclear war.

That's what my 6th grade science teacher told us anyway.

 

[chocolatehellhole]

...Anonymous so you can maintain dig-nuh-tee

Artemis can't even infiltrate a xenforo poll?

 

[Not Child.]

Because everyone loses in a nuclear war.

That's what my 6th grade science teacher told us anyway.

They were doing "duck and cover" drills in Saudi Arabian residential compounds, in the 90s (when Saddam invaded Kuwait)...they also had different brands of gas masks, you got them distributed by your employer...if you worked for a good company you got the elite gas masks, if you worked for a shitty one, they gave you the lower brands.

Also the sirens were terrifying, blood curdling shrieks. They only played them as tests, but it was scary as hell. Not one scud from Iraq was seen...in retrospect it was all performaTive nonsense.

 

[Not Child.]

I gave the "F U finger" to the screen after i typed "THIS"

I know you hate me Johnny...one of my few real "L's" here. 100%

 

[johnnynoname]

I know you hate me Johnny...one of my few real "L's" here. 100%

not true....I'm not a cookiecutter

I only hate @Meownaw for breaking all of our hearts

 

[johnnynoname]

COME BACK, @Patreeky...........

 

[johnnynoname]

.........................i will remember youUUUUUUUUUUUUU.........

 

[BakersfieldChimp]

Quite frankly we didn't kill enough gooks with em.

 

[Not Child.]

Quite frankly we didn't kill enough gooks with em.

Dropping Nukes on Vietnam after the Gulf of Tonkin incident makes infinitely more sense (on their metric) than doing it in Hiroshima/Nagasaki when the Japs signaled their surrender.

You know what they did instead? Drop more CONVENTIONAL bombs on Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia...than all of the European theater of WW2 combined. What does that tell you? It tells me if nukes were real, they would have used it then.

Why would they not use it there but did in Hiroshima/Nagasaki? Please make it make sense. "MAD" was still not a thing in 1964 (a bunch of sassy Soviet nukes in Cuba...who cares? Look at Japan today, it's thriving, maybe the Soviets retaliate by nuking Miami in 1965, who cares? Hiroshima in 2024 is thriving).

 

[Not Child.]

WTF are you going on about dude?

Why Nuke a surrendered adversary? Why not nuke an actively belligerent one after 9/11?

One nuke precisely taking out the Kaaba...and not only do you save trillions, you also overnight make billions of Muslims lose faith in Allah ("He cant protect his own House of Worship, but in the quran it says He has...Allah must be fake). One nuke and you instantly mentally crippled your biggest hurdle (Islam) in your war on terror.

 

[Brooke Shields]

it was some goofy jew schadenfreude. They all develop some great bomb to destroy a group of people that tried to answer the JQ, then it gets used on some fucking gooks who were raping other gooks to death, and all of <-that ending happened thanks to the jewish plot on allowing Pearl Harbor to give better credence for joining their jew war no one wanted. I think that's irony?

 

[Cystic Acne Survivor]

This is an especially uninformed, nuance-lacking take.

If this is a troll, you got me …and got my blood boiling like a Nagasaki nip in 1945

 

[BakersfieldChimp]

Why Nuke a surrendered adversary? Why not nuke an actively belligerent one after 9/11?

They weren't surrendered and we wanted revenge/immediate end to the war.

Who, exactly, should we have nuked after 9/11?

 

[Not Child.]

This is an especially uninformed, nuance-lacking take.

If this is a troll, you got me …and got my blood boiling like a Nagasaki nip in 1945

Im 100% non-troll mode.

The destructive nature of Nukes sound like a fantasy...Nothing about the ppl who invent/come up with this shit demonstrates an ability for them to restrain from using gamechangers...yet Nukes were only used once in combat and everything else has been in "control", even with the USSR collapsing and shitholes like Ukraine and Kazakhstan having stockades of nuke-warheads.