So we all know Patrick didn't short Tesla

[JoeCumiawearsDIAPERS]

Is Patrick involved in naked shorts of TSLA stock? Lol. He'd literally be homeless now and it would make the 40k or whatever paid to Quasi look like chump change.

That would somehow be more dignified than what the truth is which is he didn’t but just lied about it on Twitter for likes

 

[IGotATreeOnMyHouse85]

He thinks C-suite means some kind of executive lounge. He is what happens if you never enter the adult world of work.

He’s in his mid 40s yet it’s clear his entire worldview is shaped by TV and movies. From claiming to be in numerous bar fights to his rehearsed “jokes” he told in court. At this age he wouldn’t be able to even adapt to any kind of normal job / workplace.

 

[EraGodless]

He’s in his mid 40s yet it’s clear his entire worldview is shaped by TV and movies. From claiming to be in numerous bar fights to his rehearsed “jokes” he told in court. At this age he wouldn’t be able to even adapt to any kind of normal job / workplace.

He’s in his mid 40s yet it’s clear his entire worldview is shaped by TV and movies. From claiming to be in numerous bar fights to his rehearsed “jokes” he told in court. At this age he wouldn’t be able to even adapt to any kind of normal job / workplace.

He's like a jobless The Cable Guy

 

[JebJoh]

The swings is why it's a decent stock to fuck around with options-- just have to figure out the irrational market (I know, easy peasy). Retards are doing well with 0DTE's if they can guess right (it's literally like playing craps).

Patrick didn't short shut because he doesn't know shit about the market- I highly doubt he's every purchased a stock nor could he read the tables, much less "short" a stock.

Even if he just bought the dips and sold on the rebound he would have turned a much bigger gain than shorting it. The vig on borrowed stocks could suck most of his profits plus he can’t afford to hold a stock AND maintain his chubby cheesesteak diet.

 

[EraGodless]

Even if he just bought the dips and sold on the rebound he would have turned a much bigger gain than shorting it. The vig on borrowed stocks could suck most of his profits plus he can’t afford to hold a stock AND maintain his chubby cheesesteak diet.

The only dips Patrick knows about is ranch and bean.

 

[SFWA liaison]

he hasn't "cashed out" on a short the same way he hasn't cashed out of a book deal in 7 years

 

[Ladynyahh]

So he has been shorting it for two years? He knows that's not free right? Everyday (or atleast over time) it has cost the institutional investors shorting GME and AMC a lot of shekels and they have had to buy a lot of shares.

Is Patrick involved in naked shorts of TSLA stock? Lol. He'd literally be homeless now and it would make the 40k or whatever paid to Quasi look like chump change.

My positions are fully covered, stlaker. Enjoy prison.

 

[TorquieTwoBeers]

I think Pat means that he bought puts. There's no way he shorted it and was able to hold that position for more than two years, especially when he claimed he shorted it when TSLA was in the upper $200s. Since that time it has been up to near $500, which would have put enormous strain on a person with actual wealth, much less a broke loser like Pat.

But there are similar problems if he actually bought puts. First, again, he claimed this when TSLA was near $300. If he'd done that, he definitely would have sold when it was under $200. Holding as it rose back up to almost $500 = immense financial stress. Second, if he hasn't cashed out yet (lol), that means he bought puts over two years out. That's not a common move. I would say 6-12 months would be much more common. But finally, and most importantly, buying puts on a stock in the high $200s requires either a ton of cash up front (bundles of 100 shares is over $25k, soooo lmao) or a fairly large margin account, which there is no chance on earth Pat would ever get approved for given his lack of income or credit.

Him having any position on TSLA, even just owning one share, is highly dubious.

 

[IGotATreeOnMyHouse85]

I think Pat means that he bought puts. There's no way he shorted it and was able to hold that position for more than two years, especially when he claimed he shorted it when TSLA was in the upper $200s. Since that time it has been up to near $500, which would have put enormous strain on a person with actual wealth, much less a broke loser like Pat.

But there are similar problems if he actually bought puts. First, again, he claimed this when TSLA was near $300. If he'd done that, he definitely would have sold when it was under $200. Holding as it rose back up to almost $500 = immense financial stress. Second, if he hasn't cashed out yet (lol), that means he bought puts over two years out. That's not a common move. I would say 6-12 months would be much more common. But finally, and most importantly, buying puts on a stock in the high $200s requires either a ton of cash up front (bundles of 100 shares is over $25k, soooo lmao) or a fairly large margin account, which there is no chance on earth Pat would ever get approved for given his lack of income or credit.

Him having any position on TSLA, even just owning one share, is highly dubious.

Knowing Pat he saw someone else make the claim they wish they shorted it and he went full “I actually did that, child”

 

[Ladynyahh]

No he actually said he "sharted". He shit his pants at at brewers game, ya see

 

[porquedealer]

I think Pat means that he bought puts. There's no way he shorted it and was able to hold that position for more than two years, especially when he claimed he shorted it when TSLA was in the upper $200s. Since that time it has been up to near $500, which would have put enormous strain on a person with actual wealth, much less a broke loser like Pat.

But there are similar problems if he actually bought puts. First, again, he claimed this when TSLA was near $300. If he'd done that, he definitely would have sold when it was under $200. Holding as it rose back up to almost $500 = immense financial stress. Second, if he hasn't cashed out yet (lol), that means he bought puts over two years out. That's not a common move. I would say 6-12 months would be much more common. But finally, and most importantly, buying puts on a stock in the high $200s requires either a ton of cash up front (bundles of 100 shares is over $25k, soooo lmao) or a fairly large margin account, which there is no chance on earth Pat would ever get approved for given his lack of income or credit.

Him having any position on TSLA, even just owning one share, is highly dubious.

No Child.

Knowing Pat he saw someone else make the claim they wish they shorted it and he went full “I actually did that, child”

100% this.

 

[NigelCumia]

He said he shorted it in the high 200s or something which was a couple years ago, meaning he would have had to post huge collateral for like 2 years as it approached $500 to avoid getting forced covered by the broker.

He just doesn’t understand his own lie and what shorting actually is (a loan) and how rare it is for retail investors to play in that space when they can just use puts.

He’s an idiot who should stick to cold calling boomers

I was just playing Devil's Advocate (Pacino impression and/or Simpsons pinball reference) there's no way in well he actually shorted anything.

 

[IGotATreeOnMyHouse85]

No Child.

100% this.

Pat has only mentioned stock in reference to Tesla, DJT, and once that he was glad he sold off his boeing shares “long ago” - any stock talk from his fat mouth is related to orange man bad or if a company is doing bad (weird how Boeing having trouble during the Biden years wasnt Biden’s fault but with Trump and airline issues is 100% his fault) but mr Wall Street doesn’t seem to know how to pick a GOOD stock which shows he’s full of shit.

People that actually own / trade stock will tell you good moves they made or ones they wish they got early on. I have a day trader friend who was all about Tesla and Nvidia stock about 10 years ago - as you can imagine just getting those two early have made him a lot of money. He was always interested in the market and researched the companies and found ones he liked and it paid off for him. Another family friend of mine who had his own computer company that he sold for millions 30 years ago also got Nivdia at the beginning and he sold once it got to like 30 a share since he made money on his investment and felt that was as high as they would go. As you can imagine he wishes he held on.

Pat is neither a day trader or retail (long term) investor because he’s stupid and poor.

 

[TorpidSloth]

I think Pat means that he bought puts. There's no way he shorted it and was able to hold that position for more than two years, especially when he claimed he shorted it when TSLA was in the upper $200s. Since that time it has been up to near $500, which would have put enormous strain on a person with actual wealth, much less a broke loser like Pat.

But there are similar problems if he actually bought puts. First, again, he claimed this when TSLA was near $300. If he'd done that, he definitely would have sold when it was under $200. Holding as it rose back up to almost $500 = immense financial stress. Second, if he hasn't cashed out yet (lol), that means he bought puts over two years out. That's not a common move. I would say 6-12 months would be much more common. But finally, and most importantly, buying puts on a stock in the high $200s requires either a ton of cash up front (bundles of 100 shares is over $25k, soooo lmao) or a fairly large margin account, which there is no chance on earth Pat would ever get approved for given his lack of income or credit.

Him having any position on TSLA, even just owning one share, is highly dubious.

Tl;dr - he's lying and has no clue what he's talking about

 

[JoeCumiawearsDIAPERS]

I was just playing Devil's Advocate (Pacino impression and/or Simpsons pinball reference) there's no way in well he actually shorted anything.

I figured that but once you started saying he could possibly be profitable, I had to step in just on the off chance you were serious. No brotherman left behind

 

[MonsterSteve]

I think Pat means that he bought puts. There's no way he shorted it and was able to hold that position for more than two years, especially when he claimed he shorted it when TSLA was in the upper $200s. Since that time it has been up to near $500, which would have put enormous strain on a person with actual wealth, much less a broke loser like Pat.

But there are similar problems if he actually bought puts. First, again, he claimed this when TSLA was near $300. If he'd done that, he definitely would have sold when it was under $200. Holding as it rose back up to almost $500 = immense financial stress. Second, if he hasn't cashed out yet (lol), that means he bought puts over two years out. That's not a common move. I would say 6-12 months would be much more common. But finally, and most importantly, buying puts on a stock in the high $200s requires either a ton of cash up front (bundles of 100 shares is over $25k, soooo lmao) or a fairly large margin account, which there is no chance on earth Pat would ever get approved for given his lack of income or credit.

Him having any position on TSLA, even just owning one share, is highly dubious.

I don't know why you typed all this. He didn't do anything except tweet from his fart couch.

 

[WifeStoreWill]

I think Pat means that he bought puts. There's no way he shorted it and was able to hold that position for more than two years, especially when he claimed he shorted it when TSLA was in the upper $200s. Since that time it has been up to near $500, which would have put enormous strain on a person with actual wealth, much less a broke loser like Pat.

But there are similar problems if he actually bought puts. First, again, he claimed this when TSLA was near $300. If he'd done that, he definitely would have sold when it was under $200. Holding as it rose back up to almost $500 = immense financial stress. Second, if he hasn't cashed out yet (lol), that means he bought puts over two years out. That's not a common move. I would say 6-12 months would be much more common. But finally, and most importantly, buying puts on a stock in the high $200s requires either a ton of cash up front (bundles of 100 shares is over $25k, soooo lmao) or a fairly large margin account, which there is no chance on earth Pat would ever get approved for given his lack of income or credit.

Him having any position on TSLA, even just owning one share, is highly dubious.

He didn’t do shit, he’s a liar. And poor. And fat.

 

[General Fatton]

I don't know why you typed all this. He didn't do anything except tweet from his fart couch.

This. The biggest overthink this forum does is the concept of "Technicality Tomlinson." There is no 4d-chess exercise in the veracity of his statements. He just lies. He lies like a 12-year-old kid and moves on. Rage erection photo. Pearl Harbor vet. Many women send me nudes.

 

[TorquieTwoBeers]

He didn’t do shit, he’s a liar. And poor. And fat.

Don't forget 'gay'. We've all seen the video.

 

[Kurt_Love]

I think Pat means that he bought puts. There's no way he shorted it and was able to hold that position for more than two years, especially when he claimed he shorted it when TSLA was in the upper $200s. Since that time it has been up to near $500, which would have put enormous strain on a person with actual wealth, much less a broke loser like Pat.

But there are similar problems if he actually bought puts. First, again, he claimed this when TSLA was near $300. If he'd done that, he definitely would have sold when it was under $200. Holding as it rose back up to almost $500 = immense financial stress. Second, if he hasn't cashed out yet (lol), that means he bought puts over two years out. That's not a common move. I would say 6-12 months would be much more common. But finally, and most importantly, buying puts on a stock in the high $200s requires either a ton of cash up front (bundles of 100 shares is over $25k, soooo lmao) or a fairly large margin account, which there is no chance on earth Pat would ever get approved for given his lack of income or credit.

Him having any position on TSLA, even just owning one share, is highly dubious.

Would love to see his little brother or toilet, etc get a big stock market account to quote tweet how they see his lie and make it the paint water balloons of finance.